Lightshot

Put your suggestions on how to improve the community here
User avatar
Father Anderson
FWG God
Posts: 1215
Joined: 28 Apr 2012, 02:16
Location: Suplex City

Lightshot

Postby Father Anderson » 24 Oct 2014, 23:00

I have a proposition for you.

How about we allow links from lightshot, that AREN'T nasty shit, or rude shit, or literal shit.

If you like posted a nude picture, or something, you get the normal punishment for nudity (1 month ban)
If you tried to post an external link through lightshot by screencapping the link info, you get banned for the normal external link time + 2 hours for abusing lightshot or something.

I just think it'd be a good thing, if people do not abuse it.
Image BRO AWARD WITH MY BAE JOEY <3
Image
my sons

User avatar
Leprechaun Lukia
FWG God
Posts: 1997
Joined: 18 May 2011, 16:15
Location: May 18, 16:15 PM, District Court, Courtroom No. 7

Re: Lightshot

Postby Leprechaun Lukia » 24 Oct 2014, 23:01

No, wtf


It should be a day's ban if it's nudity, not a fucking month. A week at most :/
"Everyone else gave up on you... but I saw what you could be!"

User avatar
mop

Re: Lightshot

Postby mop » 24 Oct 2014, 23:04

i don't think this is a good idea. if someone's link gets deleted, they could complain about how it was an allowed link and completely ignore the fact that it was a lightshot of something inappropriate. allowing more links to be shared via chat means more rules for those links. all i see are complications that we don't need.

User avatar
Zia-
Queen of the Pokefreaks
Posts: 2633
Joined: 14 Dec 2012, 06:01
Location: The valley of the shadow of death
Contact:

Re: Lightshot

Postby Zia- » 25 Oct 2014, 00:12

what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one
Image
Your skin like winter
I felt you shiver
I heard you whisper
But the Pills were quicker
I watched you wither
I am the KILLER

User avatar
Father Anderson
FWG God
Posts: 1215
Joined: 28 Apr 2012, 02:16
Location: Suplex City

Re: Lightshot

Postby Father Anderson » 25 Oct 2014, 01:11

Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one


what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?
Image BRO AWARD WITH MY BAE JOEY <3
Image
my sons

User avatar
paladin
FWG King
Posts: 851
Joined: 12 Oct 2009, 21:32
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Lightshot

Postby paladin » 25 Oct 2014, 01:50

Bad idea. Nobody wants to get linked to a shock site or anything. NO
NOPE
NOHPE
Image The "Most Likely to Become an Evil Genius" Frookie Winner
Image
#Ian4CM
#Frook4Member
#Excalibur4PermaBan

User avatar
Shadow00

Re: Lightshot

Postby Shadow00 » 25 Oct 2014, 01:54

First things first.
I agree that we shouldn't allow any more sites other than those we have.
Do remember this is PG, technically. And yes, that's coming from me.

Now, why not 4chan

User avatar
Father Anderson
FWG God
Posts: 1215
Joined: 28 Apr 2012, 02:16
Location: Suplex City

Re: Lightshot

Postby Father Anderson » 25 Oct 2014, 04:26

Shadow00 wrote:First things first.
I agree that we shouldn't allow any more sites other than those we have.
Do remember this is PG, technically. And yes, that's coming from me.

Now, why not 4chan


In the words of frook.
'Eeeeeek 4chan is the devil'
Image BRO AWARD WITH MY BAE JOEY <3
Image
my sons

User avatar
Leprechaun Lukia
FWG God
Posts: 1997
Joined: 18 May 2011, 16:15
Location: May 18, 16:15 PM, District Court, Courtroom No. 7

Re: Lightshot

Postby Leprechaun Lukia » 25 Oct 2014, 22:54

The Baconator wrote:
Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one


what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?




im a teen thnx


And there are trolls that will do that, Bacon. They'll be like "ooh lightshot, lemme post porn and stuff"
"Everyone else gave up on you... but I saw what you could be!"

User avatar
Father Anderson
FWG God
Posts: 1215
Joined: 28 Apr 2012, 02:16
Location: Suplex City

Re: Lightshot

Postby Father Anderson » 25 Oct 2014, 23:47

lukia9999 wrote:
The Baconator wrote:
Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one


what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?




im a teen thnx


And there are trolls that will do that, Bacon. They'll be like "ooh lightshot, lemme post porn and stuff"


the trolls never look at the rules to begin with.
Image BRO AWARD WITH MY BAE JOEY <3
Image
my sons


Return to “Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests