freeworldgroup.com

I have a proposition for you.

How about we allow links from lightshot, that AREN'T nasty shit, or rude shit, or literal shit.

If you like posted a nude picture, or something, you get the normal punishment for nudity (1 month ban)
If you tried to post an external link through lightshot by screencapping the link info, you get banned for the normal external link time + 2 hours for abusing lightshot or something.

I just think it'd be a good thing, if people do not abuse it.

No, wtf


It should be a day's ban if it's nudity, not a fucking month. A week at most :/

i don't think this is a good idea. if someone's link gets deleted, they could complain about how it was an allowed link and completely ignore the fact that it was a lightshot of something inappropriate. allowing more links to be shared via chat means more rules for those links. all i see are complications that we don't need.

what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one

Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one

what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?

Bad idea. Nobody wants to get linked to a shock site or anything. NO
NOPE
NOHPE

First things first.
I agree that we shouldn't allow any more sites other than those we have.
Do remember this is PG, technically. And yes, that's coming from me.

Now, why not 4chan

Shadow00 wrote:First things first.
I agree that we shouldn't allow any more sites other than those we have.
Do remember this is PG, technically. And yes, that's coming from me.

Now, why not 4chan

In the words of frook.
'Eeeeeek 4chan is the devil'

The Baconator wrote:

Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one

what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?

im a teen thnx


And there are trolls that will do that, Bacon. They'll be like "ooh lightshot, lemme post porn and stuff"

lukia9999 wrote:

The Baconator wrote:

Zia-chan wrote:what mop said, as well as the fact that we can determine if a link is allowed or not just by hovering over it, while with lightshot, if it were to be allowed, mods would have to actually view the image, which could be literally anything, its risky. Now if a chatter posts something inappropriate through lightshot, it would take longer to deal with it and more people could potentially view it, which if it was something like pornography or something disturbing and gorey, would be horrific for our younger members and chatters to see if they clicked on it. i think the cons really outweigh the pros on this one

what younger chatters, I mean, there's lukia, that's about it.
and it should be a mod's JOB to put up with the bad bs.
and who's to say the people even WILL do that?

im a teen thnx


And there are trolls that will do that, Bacon. They'll be like "ooh lightshot, lemme post porn and stuff"

the trolls never look at the rules to begin with.