Rolf Harris EEEEEEEEEEEEEK

[The Divine Potato]

. . . Can I castrate him now?

Oh pls, like molesters cannot molest after being castrated.

Thats not the point . . . The point is to make them suffer, even though they can't possible suffer like they made their victims suffer. . . because "thats inhumane" and junk... Anyway... I hate disgusting creeps...

If you want to make people suffer then you're on the same level as them.
I don't care about "inhumane" crap, I really don't. But I honestly doubt the molested person gains anything from torturing the molester.

What would be the best solution is that no one was molested to begin with.

Except its already too late for that...
Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth is stupid, I know that. It just makes everyone blind and toothless, and really doesn't help, but some people are just...ugh

I don't believe in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but if there was no form of punishment, I wouldn't be saying Kumbaya or however it's spelt, I am heartless in the face of another human life, so long as they have fewer redeeming qualities. Heartlessness is what creates bad people, but bad people are not given a chance in this world of ours, so I'm gonna give Rolfy boy a chance, same as even mister Saville here in Britain, I think a number of these allegations are wrongfully put and soon they are going to turn to the level of accusing him of necrophilia, just like Jim, however I believe that at least a few of these girls are wrong.

[GarthVader449]

I don't believe in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but if there was no form of punishment, I wouldn't be saying Kumbaya or however it's spelt, I am heartless in the face of another human life, so long as they have fewer redeeming qualities. Heartlessness is what creates bad people, but bad people are not given a chance in this world of ours, so I'm gonna give Rolfy boy a chance, same as even mister Saville here in Britain, I think a number of these allegations are wrongfully put and soon they are going to turn to the level of accusing him of necrophilia, just like Jim, however I believe that at least a few of these girls are wrong.

Why do you feel that they are wrong? The police carry out investigations either proving or disproving the accusations. All information/evidence is gathered and then put before an independent jury who will then decide whether the defendant is guilty, or not. We have this sort of law system to both ensure justice happens, but also to make sure the accused doesn't become a victim of someone's 'wolf cry'. He was not charged for all the accusations against him, and furthermore he was not found guilty for every charge brought against him.

To say that even one charge brought against him, and the same charge he was found guilty of, is malicious. Is an even more weighty accusation than any said against him.

[The Divine Potato]

I don't believe in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but if there was no form of punishment, I wouldn't be saying Kumbaya or however it's spelt, I am heartless in the face of another human life, so long as they have fewer redeeming qualities. Heartlessness is what creates bad people, but bad people are not given a chance in this world of ours, so I'm gonna give Rolfy boy a chance, same as even mister Saville here in Britain, I think a number of these allegations are wrongfully put and soon they are going to turn to the level of accusing him of necrophilia, just like Jim, however I believe that at least a few of these girls are wrong.

Why do you feel that they are wrong? The police carry out investigations either proving or disproving the accusations. All information/evidence is gathered and then put before an independent jury who will then decide whether the defendant is guilty, or not. We have this sort of law system to both ensure justice happens, but also to make sure the accused doesn't become a victim of someone's 'wolf cry'. He was not charged for all the accusations against him, and furthermore he was not found guilty for every charge brought against him.

To say that even one charge brought against him, and the same charge he was found guilty of, is malicious. Is an even more weighty accusation than any said against him.

I'm just going to highlight a crucial part in my statement in bold, simply to state how you just wrote off my incredible statement of kindness when if I hadn't been saying that I'd be chanting 'death to Rolf Harris' probably, my statement was not limited to those who were not already found out calling a hoax, because what news recognition do they get? Nothing at all and news is the way I keep informed on matters like this so please, take the walk of shame and make sure you read into everything EVERYTHING.

[The Divine Potato]

I don't believe in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but if there was no form of punishment, I wouldn't be saying Kumbaya or however it's spelt, I am heartless in the face of another human life, so long as they have fewer redeeming qualities. Heartlessness is what creates bad people, but bad people are not given a chance in this world of ours, so I'm gonna give Rolfy boy a chance, same as even mister Saville here in Britain, I think a number of these allegations are wrongfully put and soon they are going to turn to the level of accusing him of necrophilia, just like Jim, however I believe that at least a few of these girls are wrong.

Why do you feel that they are wrong? The police carry out investigations either proving or disproving the accusations. All information/evidence is gathered and then put before an independent jury who will then decide whether the defendant is guilty, or not. We have this sort of law system to both ensure justice happens, but also to make sure the accused doesn't become a victim of someone's 'wolf cry'. He was not charged for all the accusations against him, and furthermore he was not found guilty for every charge brought against him.

To say that even one charge brought against him, and the same charge he was found guilty of, is malicious. Is an even more weighty accusation than any said against him.

I'm just going to highlight a crucial part in my statement in bold, simply to state how you just wrote off my incredible statement of kindness when if I hadn't been saying that I'd be chanting 'death to Rolf Harris' probably, my statement was not limited to those who were not already found out calling a hoax, because what news recognition do they get? Nothing at all and news is the way I keep informed on matters like this so please, take the walk of shame and make sure you read into everything EVERYTHING.

You killed a respectable argument with that pretty rude tone.

I am unsure of how to respond to that in a respectable tone, so all I will say is that the argument would most likely have escalated, and that I will try to at least be less abrasive.

[GarthVader449]

Pretty sure my response was both dignified and founded correctly in replying to your statement. If I offended you in any way, I'm sorry, truly no harm or was meant.