Gender Roles -'_'-

Talk about serious issues here!
User avatar
Boxorino
The Foxy Boxy
Posts: 7940
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 23:05
Location: oversharing (tm)
Contact:

Re: Gender Roles -'_'-

Postby Boxorino » 17 Nov 2014, 01:04

Tycoon Witch wrote:

i /think/ this is the video boxy wanted


yes! that it is! how did you ever find that???
that was dramatic. still ready 2 die tho!

User avatar
Foopzheart
SKREEEEEEEE
Posts: 3696
Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 22:36
Location: SKREEEEE
Contact:

Re: Gender Roles -'_'-

Postby Foopzheart » 17 Nov 2014, 02:01

IlikeAwesomeSauce wrote:
Tycoon Witch wrote:

i /think/ this is the video boxy wanted


yes! that it is! how did you ever find that???

so is my actual credible source being ignored in favor of a youtube video or
vaguely present
Image
SKREEE SKREEEEEE SKREEEEEEEEE

User avatar
Shadowstar1922
I Shall Eatz You
Posts: 5772
Joined: 03 May 2011, 21:51
Location: i don't even know bro
Contact:

Re: Gender Roles -'_'-

Postby Shadowstar1922 » 17 Nov 2014, 11:01

Fuipui wrote:
IlikeAwesomeSauce wrote:
Tycoon Witch wrote:

i /think/ this is the video boxy wanted


yes! that it is! how did you ever find that???

so is my actual credible source being ignored in favor of a youtube video or

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7817496.stm

Here's a source saying its linked to Adolf Hitler, your source links it to American preference in the manufacturing business in America. Not about the whole world. This is the expert of your source,

"For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti.

In 1927, Time magazine printed a chart showing sex-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.S. stores. In Boston, Filene’s told parents to dress boys in pink. So did Best & Co. in New York City, Halle’s in Cleveland and Marshall Field in Chicago.

Today’s color dictate wasn’t established until the 1940s, as a result of Americans’ preferences as interpreted by manufacturers and retailers. “It could have gone the other way,” Paoletti says.

So the baby boomers were raised in gender-specific clothing. Boys dressed like their fathers, girls like their mothers. Girls had to wear dresses to school, though unadorned styles and tomboy play clothes were acceptable."
~
Image
Image

User avatar
Tycoon
FWG Mod
Posts: 1579
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 14:44
Location: the ocean floor

Re: Gender Roles -'_'-

Postby Tycoon » 17 Nov 2014, 18:46

IlikeAwesomeSauce wrote:
yes! that it is! how did you ever find that???


i recognised it as john/hank green even tho i don't watch their videos
and looked the name up after hitler switched blue and pink
Image FWG Potential Princess 2016

#FreeWorldFinder 2nd place in Scavenger Hunt
#3 in the Halloween competition
~ it's a perfect day / to float away ~

User avatar
Foopzheart
SKREEEEEEEE
Posts: 3696
Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 22:36
Location: SKREEEEE
Contact:

Re: Gender Roles -'_'-

Postby Foopzheart » 17 Nov 2014, 23:48

Shadowstar1922 wrote:
Fuipui wrote:
IlikeAwesomeSauce wrote:
Tycoon Witch wrote:

i /think/ this is the video boxy wanted


yes! that it is! how did you ever find that???

so is my actual credible source being ignored in favor of a youtube video or

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7817496.stm

Here's a source saying its linked to Adolf Hitler, your source links it to American preference in the manufacturing business in America. Not about the whole world. This is the expert of your source,

"For example, a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department said, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti.

In 1927, Time magazine printed a chart showing sex-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.S. stores. In Boston, Filene’s told parents to dress boys in pink. So did Best & Co. in New York City, Halle’s in Cleveland and Marshall Field in Chicago.

Today’s color dictate wasn’t established until the 1940s, as a result of Americans’ preferences as interpreted by manufacturers and retailers. “It could have gone the other way,” Paoletti says.

So the baby boomers were raised in gender-specific clothing. Boys dressed like their fathers, girls like their mothers. Girls had to wear dresses to school, though unadorned styles and tomboy play clothes were acceptable."
~

yes. because it started in the US according to my article. yours says,

BBC NEWS wrote:What prompted the switch is unclear, but it had been made by the time Adolf Hitler ordered the classification of homosexuals. Those deemed "curable" were sent to concentration camps and labelled with a pink triangle. This suggests that by then, pink was associated with femininity.


note the bold.
vaguely present
Image
SKREEE SKREEEEEE SKREEEEEEEEE


Return to “Serious Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest