Is the moon hollow?
- Master of Pie
- FWG King
- Posts: 767
- Joined: 12 Aug 2012, 14:31
- Location: Usually this dimension
Re: Is the moon hollow?
WAAAAAAAIT it cant be hollow because if it was, meteors would just crash through instead of making craters
My favorite beverage is your blood.
If someone has already posted this, shoot me in the arm.
The Official FWG Searchomatic9000

If someone has already posted this, shoot me in the arm.
The Official FWG Searchomatic9000

Re: Is the moon hollow?
Master of Pie wrote:WAAAAAAAIT it cant be hollow because if it was, meteors would just crash through instead of making craters
Partly hollow, of course. It needs to have some mass, or it wouldnt orbit
- Shadowstar1922
- I Shall Eatz You
- Posts: 5772
- Joined: 03 May 2011, 21:51
- Location: i don't even know bro
- Contact:
Re: Is the moon hollow?
Shadow00 wrote:Master of Pie wrote:WAAAAAAAIT it cant be hollow because if it was, meteors would just crash through instead of making craters
Partly hollow, of course. It needs to have some mass, or it wouldnt orbit
Agreed. The Moon's not completely hollow.
Besides, the moon was bombarded with so many asteroids because it had no atmosphere to destroy most of them. So, one asteroid hit one place, there's a big hole, then a couple astroids hit around that hole, pushing the dirt or, whatever materials there is on the moon, up and towards the hole, overtime, covering it up. To make it SEEM that it's hollow.
I highly doubt the Moon is really hollow. It just has some covered up holes. Earth has those too. Those are called landslides!(well, when the covering material collapses)
Also, to the person who first said Pluto wasn't a planet, they only canceled Pluto being a planet because they found so many other Pluto Like objects behind and around Pluto. With, around the same size of course. But, since Pluto was bigger than these planets, they kept Pluto as a planet. What even further decreased Pluto's chance of staying as a planet, is they found about 6 planet-like objects between Mars and Jupiter. No, not the astroid belt, and the little messed up blocks of rock, there were completely spherical. But, they didn't have any similar traits of Jupter nor Mars. Some of these planets are Ceres and Pallas. At one point in the American education system, they included these two planets, as well as three other more for kids learning bout the Eleven planets of the solar system. Then they ditched them. Now, with all these little objects being called planets that were discovered, they kept finding more and more. Once they found a much bigger planet around Pluto's area that was an iceblock, and bigger than Pluto, that's when they decided to ditch Pluto as being a planet.
So, Pluto's not a planet anymore because it has too many brothers and sisters floatin' around xD
Though, it has three moons, which all these other "dwarf" planets don't have, which suggests it should stay as a planet. I think it should, because of these three moons.


Return to “Serious Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest