I believe every single person has realized that we're getting too many for this world to handle (people). So, unless we find out how to go to the other side of the univers where the "Earth's twin" was discovered in the next let's say 20 years,we're pretty much doomed.
So now I'm going to make one of the most controversial statements I've ever made:
I believe that it's all due to the technological advance of the medical science in the past few years,in other words,I believe that some diseases weren't meant to be cured,some diseases are just nature fighting back or something. Ofcourse that all sounds like chaos' theory ._.
So what do you think? Should we advance so much in saving others' lives without having planned what we should do next? We all know that natural resources are depleting really soon,we're cutting down forests to cover our needs, so plainly stated,if we don't die of a WW3 (highly unlikely),we're going to die of the climate change.
Bright opinions,I know.
Overpopulation
- pretty boi is best
- FWG Assassin
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 08 Jul 2011, 03:11
- Location: canada eh :3
Re: Overpopulation
well i think its kinda weird that we spend like over 10$ million for cancer research each year, but nothing.........so my opinion is that the government already has a cure for cancer but chooses not to use it just so they get $$$
and of course to keep the population at a steady rate
and of course to keep the population at a steady rate
Re: Overpopulation
Shadow00 wrote:I believe every single person has realized that we're getting too many for this world to handle (people). So, unless we find out how to go to the other side of the univers where the "Earth's twin" was discovered in the next let's say 20 years,we're pretty much doomed.
So now I'm going to make one of the most controversial statements I've ever made:
I believe that it's all due to the technological advance of the medical science in the past few years,in other words,I believe that some diseases weren't meant to be cured,some diseases are just nature fighting back or something. Ofcourse that all sounds like chaos' theory ._.
So what do you think? Should we advance so much in saving others' lives without having planned what we should do next? We all know that natural resources are depleting really soon,we're cutting down forests to cover our needs, so plainly stated,if we don't die of a WW3 (highly unlikely),we're going to die of the climate change.
Bright opinions,I know.
I completely agree. Death and disease are part of natures way of controlling populations. By increasing the lifespan of humans, we've actually created a greater problem. The world currently struggles to feed the population of most countries. With current methods of agriculture, we're almost at the 'carrying capacity' of the globe. If we do not want mass starvation's and conflict over limited food and water resources, we need to find alternative methods of agriculture in areas previously unused, explore aquaculture options or simply limit population growth the way China does it - max 1 child per family. Also, we need to build a rocket ship to take us to Earth 2.0
- Lightning Orb
- The Superior Orby
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 17:06
- Location: Cloud 69
- Contact:
Re: Overpopulation
alice_cullen wrote:Just wait for 2012, that'll take care of it.
We aren't going to die.
Re: Overpopulation
Overpopulation has a simple fix, complete and utter genocide of many individuals (2.7 Billion would be fine)
Re: Overpopulation
16hockjo wrote:Overpopulation has a simple fix, complete and utter genocide of many individuals (2.7 Billion would be fine)
This is basically what I think will happen. Not exactly the best ending,but surely the most realistic one. The point is, there are too many complications over this,as (might be offensive now to some) religion (aka who are we to judge who should die etc),as well as lack of time (you can't just go as in Noe's ark and put all the good guys in a place,then wipe of the rest. Also,how can that happen without mass destruction?
The surprising part is that the media's propaganda won't be against any of these things
- Lightning Orb
- The Superior Orby
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 17:06
- Location: Cloud 69
- Contact:
Re: Overpopulation
alice_cullen wrote:*Adds Orb to 'List of people to kill in 2012 because they don't believe in 2012'*
>:D
Good Luck.
Re: Overpopulation
16hockjo wrote:Overpopulation has a simple fix, complete and utter genocide of many individuals (2.7 Billion would be fine)
lets just wipe out the entire planetary population from the southern hemisphere.
- Lamb
- I Shall Eatz You
- Posts: 4840
- Joined: 05 Nov 2010, 23:23
- Location: In a room watching anime, studying other stuff, and basically making others laugh.
- Contact:
Re: Overpopulation
FWG Leader wrote:16hockjo wrote:Overpopulation has a simple fix, complete and utter genocide of many individuals (2.7 Billion would be fine)
lets just wipe out the entire planetary population from the southern hemisphere.
o.O i think that is a bit discrimative,even thou' you might be playing around, because this is in the serious discussion.
Re: Overpopulation
25% percent of each country must be eliminated.
Return to “Serious Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests