Nuclear War with North Korea

Talk about serious issues here!
User avatar
Dr Frook
FWG Mod
Posts: 9039
Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 05:35
Location: freaksville
Contact:

Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Dr Frook » 09 Mar 2013, 00:37

well, they've been threatening to launch a pre-emptive strike. What are your thoughts? Bluster again from North Korea, or will it really be war this time?

Scary times... as usual.

Image
The BUGBLATTER BEAST HAS SPOKEN, ALL HAIL THE BLATTERER!
Image

User avatar
Toady
FWG Mod
Posts: 478
Joined: 22 Nov 2009, 02:59
Location: #HatterNation

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Toady » 09 Mar 2013, 00:40

Do you really think that North Korea threatened anyone else but the US and South Korea? Lol
LET'S GO HATTERS!!!
Image

User avatar
Blood Knight
FWG Minor Noble
Posts: 169
Joined: 26 Oct 2010, 20:20
Location: Ask Frook.
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Blood Knight » 09 Mar 2013, 00:44

I'm all for it if Korea wants to destroy the world as we know it. Especially because I'll be fighting in the war (most likely) if they do start anything. I can't wait! O_O

Now to be serious; N-Korea would have to be completely idiotic to wage war with the US. I watched the news with the story and CHINA will NOT back them up in a war they would fight with the US. And even then, the UN would shove their foot straight up N-Korea's (you know where I was going with that sentence). And if they even think about Launching a NUKE or IBM at us, the earth will go to hell and look like hell after all is done and over with.
@echo off
color a
:A
echo %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random% %random%
goto :A

User avatar
ghost 9
FWG King
Posts: 824
Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 18:33
Location: In your walls. O-o
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby ghost 9 » 09 Mar 2013, 01:05

It'd be a short war. China wouldn't back them if they initiated the aggression, and they know it. Even if they did strike first, the AEGIS and Patriot missiles would shoot them down and render them useless. Then we'd have NATO route forces into South Korea.
Our airforce and navy would wipe them out, while NATO forces in India and South Korea invade. China and Russia wouldn't intervene, and then North Korea would be doomed.
"The costs of action are far less than the costs of inaction."

"If you don't want to be forgotten as soon as you're dead, write something worth reading, or do something worth writing"

User avatar
Dr Frook
FWG Mod
Posts: 9039
Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 05:35
Location: freaksville
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Dr Frook » 09 Mar 2013, 01:33

North Korea reminds me of a two year old child.

Image
The BUGBLATTER BEAST HAS SPOKEN, ALL HAIL THE BLATTERER!
Image

User avatar
paladin
FWG King
Posts: 851
Joined: 12 Oct 2009, 21:32
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby paladin » 09 Mar 2013, 01:47

ghost 9 wrote:It'd be a short war. China wouldn't back them if they initiated the aggression, and they know it. Even if they did strike first, the AEGIS and Patriot missiles would shoot them down and render them useless. Then we'd have NATO route forces into South Korea.
Our airforce and navy would wipe them out, while NATO forces in India and South Korea invade. China and Russia wouldn't intervene, and then North Korea would be doomed.

It wouldn't really be a short war. You're forgetting about 3 MAJOR points.
1. They kinda have a 1 Million Man ARMY. Not entire armed forces, JUST THE ARMY! Well trained, prolly brainwashed, and also fearless.
2. AEGIS/Patriot missiles - They wouldn't work for a couple reasons. A: They'd use ICBM's to attack USA and each ICBM would have at LEAST 6 Nuclear warheads in them. They'd launch the warheads from the ICBM at a good range from the coast and would kaboozle everything. B: They wouldnt just send 1 missile. that'd be stupid. They'd send at LEAST 5, more than likely 10 or 15. C: Stealth Bombers? North Korea has them too. We cant pick them up. Duck and Cover.
3. Iran - You're forgetting about the #1 country that hates the US the most aside from North Korea. If 2 people hate 1 person, they'll prolly team up against them. Same thing with countries.
As you can see, the end result of ANY conflict started would be WWIII and a Nuclear Holocaust. :)
Image The "Most Likely to Become an Evil Genius" Frookie Winner
Image
#Ian4CM
#Frook4Member
#Excalibur4PermaBan

User avatar
ghost 9
FWG King
Posts: 824
Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 18:33
Location: In your walls. O-o
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby ghost 9 » 09 Mar 2013, 02:52

paladin wrote:
ghost 9 wrote:It'd be a short war. China wouldn't back them if they initiated the aggression, and they know it. Even if they did strike first, the AEGIS and Patriot missiles would shoot them down and render them useless. Then we'd have NATO route forces into South Korea.
Our airforce and navy would wipe them out, while NATO forces in India and South Korea invade. China and Russia wouldn't intervene, and then North Korea would be doomed.

It wouldn't really be a short war. You're forgetting about 3 MAJOR points.
1. They kinda have a 1 Million Man ARMY. Not entire armed forces, JUST THE ARMY! Well trained, prolly brainwashed, and also fearless.
2. AEGIS/Patriot missiles - They wouldn't work for a couple reasons. A: They'd use ICBM's to attack USA and each ICBM would have at LEAST 6 Nuclear warheads in them. They'd launch the warheads from the ICBM at a good range from the coast and would kaboozle everything. B: They wouldnt just send 1 missile. that'd be stupid. They'd send at LEAST 5, more than likely 10 or 15. C: Stealth Bombers? North Korea has them too. We cant pick them up. Duck and Cover.
3. Iran - You're forgetting about the #1 country that hates the US the most aside from North Korea. If 2 people hate 1 person, they'll prolly team up against them. Same thing with countries.
As you can see, the end result of ANY conflict started would be WWIII and a Nuclear Holocaust. :)


1.) It's not well trained, and the majority are armed with RPGs. Inaccurate at best. Not to mention how easy it would be to make the rockets rupture and explode before they can even fire them. They also only spend about 4 billion on military, compared to the 27 billion south korea spent, the 40 billion Japan spent, the 32 billion India spent ,and the 700 billion the US spent.

2.) They're barely even making regular nukes now. XD They have at least 15-20 years before they reach ICBMs.

3.) Iran isn't a factor right now. Turkey and Israel alone can handle them.Israel's done it before.

So it wont end in a nuclear Holocaust, or even a proper world war.
"The costs of action are far less than the costs of inaction."

"If you don't want to be forgotten as soon as you're dead, write something worth reading, or do something worth writing"

User avatar
Dr Frook
FWG Mod
Posts: 9039
Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 05:35
Location: freaksville
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Dr Frook » 09 Mar 2013, 02:57

the war will be drawn out unless the US decides to nuke them several times.

North Korea has 5 primitive nukes at best.

no chance of mounting one on a missile yet

most likely if they did it would blow up while they try to launch the thing.

their army is huge, but is probably malnourished to a certain extent.

it all depends on how suicidal their military are. I suspect mass defections if a war started... but who knows, the brain washing may have been very effective.
The BUGBLATTER BEAST HAS SPOKEN, ALL HAIL THE BLATTERER!
Image

User avatar
Hitokiri
FWG King
Posts: 744
Joined: 14 Jan 2010, 11:56

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Hitokiri » 09 Mar 2013, 10:51

It's a bit like the Old soviet threat.

The leaders think their country is fine, but the situation in the villages is extremely bad.
But in a communist country, the bearer of bad news gets shot, so they only give the leadership good news.

So, at the most, they have very primitive nuclear weapons.
Most of their tests at long range missiles have failed.
You can forget about ICBM's.

Their main support (which is China, not Iran) has already repeatedly told them to stop this nonsense.

Oh and for Ghost:
NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
They do not have a mandate to intervene anywhere in the world.
The intervention with mostly air support for Libya was because that's very, very close to europe.

For any military assistance, you should be looking for the UN and UN security council.
In which China no longer blocks measures towards N. Korea with it's veto power.
Which is a very very important signal towards N. Korea.
Image

User avatar
Shadowstar1922
I Shall Eatz You
Posts: 5771
Joined: 03 May 2011, 21:51
Location: i don't even know bro
Contact:

Re: Nuclear War with North Korea

Postby Shadowstar1922 » 09 Mar 2013, 19:49

If any of you guys actually think Iran is a threat, and would join in the war, you're completely wrong.

Watch this documentary. It's going to prove most of your beliefs on Iran wrong.

Last edited by Shadowstar1922 on 10 Mar 2013, 13:38, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image


Return to “Serious Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests