10 Ways to Reduce the Threat of Terrorist Attacks on America

[Shadowstar1922]

Declare a moratorium on drone strikes: The head of Al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, is calling on jihadists to retaliate for US drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen. The Yemeni group Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), where the US says the threats are emanating from, is also calling for retaliation for drones strikes (there have been four strikes in Yemen since July 28). Drone strikes have become the number one recruiting tool for extremists. By grounding the drones, we will stop creating new enemies faster than we can kill them.

Close the US drone base in Saudi Arabia: One of the reasons Obama bin Laden said he hated the United States was that the US had military bases in the Holy Lands in Saudi Arabia. President Bush quietly closed those bases in 2003 but in 2010 President Obama secretly reopened a base there for launching drones into Yemen. It’s a national security threat ripe for blowback. So are many of the over 800 US bases peppered all over the world. We can save billions of taxpayer dollars, and make ourselves safer, by closing them.

Free the 86 Guantanamo prisoners cleared for release: The US treatment of Guantanamo prisoners, holding people indefinitely without charges or trials and brutally force-feeding the hunger strikers, is an affront to people throughout the Muslim world and a blatant hypocrisy of our American values. Of the 166 prisoners left in Guantanamo, 86 have been cleared for release, meaning the US government has determined they represent no threat to our nation. President Obama can use the waiver system, certifying to Congress that it is in the US national interest to release them. He just did this, for the first time, for two Algerian prisoners. He should do this for all 86 cleared prisoners, then bring the remaining prisoners to the US for trials.

Apologize and compensate innocent victims: There is a perception in the Muslim world that the US government does not value their lives. Airstrikes have killed many innocent people and only in the cases of Afghanistan and Iraq has there been a way, albeit woefully inadequate, for aggrieved families to seek redress. The US should agree to apologize and compensate the families of innocent people who have been killed or maimed by the US armed forces or CIA.

Go for the “zero option” in Afghanistan: withdraw all US troops: The 11-year US occupation of Afghanistan has provided fodder for the Taliban in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, while propping up an unpopular and corrupt regime in Kabul. And if the US troops were not in Afghanistan, the Taliban would not be trying to cross the Pakistani border to kill US soldiers. President Obama promised to end the US occupation by the end of 2014, but is now weighing options for keeping thousands of troops and military contractors behind. Bad idea.

Sit down and talk: The Taliban opened an office in Qatar in June to finally start long-delayed talks with the US. But due to President Karzai’s objections, the talks were nixed. It’s long past the time to talk to the Taliban, and then move on to talk to those elements in Al Qaeda who are more rational and open to negotiations. If you look at the Rand Corporation’s study of the demise of 268 terrorist groups, 43% dissolved by joining the political process, 40% from better policing, and only 7% through military action. We’ve been using military action for over a decade; it’s time for another approach.

Stop supporting dictatorships and repressive militaries: The US recently signed the largest arms deal in history with the monarchy of Saudi Arabia, the same government that rolled its tanks into neighboring Bahrain to crush the democratic uprising there. In Egypt, US weapons and tear gas were used for decades against peaceful demonstrators, and continue to be used against peaceful protesters supporting ousted Muslim Brotherhood. While weapons sales to undemocratic and/or unstable regimes might be good for US weapons manufacturers, they are bad for the reputation and security of the American people.

Support non-violent democracy movements: Terrorists thrive best where there is chaos and instability. Nurturing democratic institutions and non-violent civil society are key to thwarting the growth of extremist movements. The US needs to do more than support these efforts; it also needs to listen to them. In Yemen, the US is helping to fund the 6-month experiment in democracy called the National Dialogue Conference, where 565 extremely diverse members of society are meeting daily to map out the nation’s future. The Conference recently passed, by overwhelming vote, a resolution declaring drones strikes and all extrajudicial killing illegal. Unfortunately, the US has refused to abide by the popular will thus far.

Adhere to the international rule of law: In its war on terror, the US has been killing terror suspects with blatant disregard for international law and national sovereignty. A July 18 Pew poll of 39 nations found fierce global opposition to US drone strikes, particularly in the Muslim world. If the US wants help and sympathy in rooting out would-be attackers, it has to show the world it will stop using extrajudicial assassinations and start adhering to international law.

Spend foreign aid money on education, healthcare and lifting people out of poverty: For a fraction of the money we keep wasting each month on the failed war in Afghanistan or supporting the already wealthy Israeli military, we could be building schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan, helping Yemenis find a solution to their water shortages, and providing humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees. We’ll make a lot more friends building clinics, wells, electrical grids and schools than vaporizing people with Hellfire missiles.

This 10-point plan would significantly reduce terrorist threats, save taxpayers billions of dollars and make Americans more loved and admired in the world. After a decade of wielding the military stick, it’s time for some carrots.

Original article: http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... sone_share

Thoughts and opinions?

[Shadow00]

#11
Kill all the terrorists.
At least that's the tactic that is being used right now

[Elcoolio]

I know stop invading countries for no good reason, and no oil isn't a good reason.

[Shadowstar1922]

#11
Kill all the terrorists.
At least that's the tactic that is being used right now

That tactic isn't working. XD

[Dr Frook]

talking to extremists is pointless. All they want is any non extreme muslims to be dead enslaved to their way of thinking.

[Shadowstar1922]

talking to extremists is pointless. All they want is any non extreme muslims to be dead enslaved to their way of thinking.

Talking to extremists with no reasonable or logical goal/cause/actions is pointless. And, you don't necessarily talk to them, but compromise with them. See what you can work out to make a safer society.

And, the statistics shown out of the 268 terrorist groups that were "demised", 92% of them dissolved with reformations that were needed in the area. Once the Governments start working with the people, that means everyone and does changes, they see no point in existing.

[Shadow00]

talking to extremists is pointless. All they want is any non extreme muslims to be dead enslaved to their way of thinking.

Talking to extremists with no reasonable or logical goal/cause/actions is pointless. And, you don't necessarily talk to them, but compromise with them. See what you can work out to make a safer society.

And, the statistics shown out of the 268 terrorist groups that were "demised", 92% of them dissolved with reformations that were needed in the area. Once the Governments start working with the people, that means everyone and does changes, they see no point in existing.

No Frook is right on this one.
You can't reason with extremists. The more you delay their apprehension the more lives you place at risk.
People that have the resolve to kill someone or even suicide so they can kill others are beyond reasoning.

[Shadowstar1922]

talking to extremists is pointless. All they want is any non extreme muslims to be dead enslaved to their way of thinking.

Talking to extremists with no reasonable or logical goal/cause/actions is pointless. And, you don't necessarily talk to them, but compromise with them. See what you can work out to make a safer society.

And, the statistics shown out of the 268 terrorist groups that were "demised", 92% of them dissolved with reformations that were needed in the area. Once the Governments start working with the people, that means everyone and does changes, they see no point in existing.

No Frook is right on this one.
You can't reason with extremists. The more you delay their apprehension the more lives you place at risk.
People that have the resolve to kill someone or even suicide so they can kill others are beyond reasoning.

You can't reason with extremists because no one has ever tried. Statistics point to that you can reason with extremists by making compromises.

[Shadow00]

No the stats are so low because the people that try usually die, this never report the failed attempt.

[Shadowstar1922]

Shadow, the people who died wouldn't be able to represent their terrorist group when negotiations take place, and the leaders of the terrorist groups wouldn't be blowing themselves up/do risky missions, they'd have lower ranked members blow themselves up/do risky missions so the group is maintained and does not fall apart.

Same with Governments. You don't see the President or the top generals of the military leading any battles(unless they're extremely important, and even then the president would never take part of those) during war time. They might partake in important ones, but nontheless, the top leaders never do dangerous or risky or suicidal missions in order to keep the group alive.

Sooo, terrorist groups would have the same top leaders because they'd never get themselves killed in order to keep the group alive, and functioning properly. So it is quite possible to negotiate, Shadow.