Who saw the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham???
Thoughts Comments??
Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.
Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
#BestShooter #Orby#Running
~ Coolest
~ Coolest
- Awesome Creep
- FWG Prince
- Posts: 416
- Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 19:50
- Location: Cheyenne, WY, USA
- Contact:
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Excalibur wrote:Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.
Yes. Bill Nye had a lot more points supporting his side, whereas with Ken Ham it felt like he was repeating the same point the entire time.
All my friends are heathens, take it slow...
WATCH IT!
|-/
WATCH IT!
|-/
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Awesome Creep wrote:Excalibur wrote:Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.
Yes. Bill Nye had a lot more points supporting his side, whereas with Ken Ham it felt like he was repeating the same point the entire time.
The perfect description of when a scientist has an argument with a religious person over something religion related.
Facts vs the same point over and over again.
Result was pretty much expected.
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
u cant argue with faith - no matter what is said - faith wins out.
The BUGBLATTER BEAST HAS SPOKEN, ALL HAIL THE BLATTERER!
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
FWG Leader wrote:u cant argue with faith - no matter what is said - faith wins out.
Not sure if you said that sarcastically.
#BestShooter #Orby#Running
~ Coolest
~ Coolest
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Frook is a fervent Southern Baptist, he'd never say something about the Lord sarcastically.
I didn't watch the debate because Ken Hamm would probably have pissed me off. While I'm sure that one could rebuff some claims about Creationism being wrong, you can't win an argument that way.
In my opinion, who cares to what extent Christianity is "scientifically accurate?" The teachings, regardless of origin or time period or author, remain a hugely important moral compass for the world at large.
I didn't watch the debate because Ken Hamm would probably have pissed me off. While I'm sure that one could rebuff some claims about Creationism being wrong, you can't win an argument that way.
In my opinion, who cares to what extent Christianity is "scientifically accurate?" The teachings, regardless of origin or time period or author, remain a hugely important moral compass for the world at large.
For trying.
- Lamb
- I Shall Eatz You
- Posts: 4840
- Joined: 05 Nov 2010, 23:23
- Location: In a room watching anime, studying other stuff, and basically making others laugh.
- Contact:
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
I stopped very early on, but all I can say is, Lies... BUNCH OF LIES!!
I can accept the fact that perhaps there is a god or superior being, but to say that the world is 6000 years old?.. ._. I have nothing to say..
I can accept the fact that perhaps there is a god or superior being, but to say that the world is 6000 years old?.. ._. I have nothing to say..
I've lost my pieces.
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Idk, I keep my faith and science on different levels.
Ken Ham is kinda looney.
Ken Ham is kinda looney.
#BestShooter #Orby#Running
~ Coolest
~ Coolest
- dankness75
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 15 Aug 2012, 15:11
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Religion is like a way of life and people either go against it even when they claim to be part of that Religion. They give it a bad name.
Religion is very important in me life and I see that some of the things Science say, it's in the holy book.
Religion is very important in me life and I see that some of the things Science say, it's in the holy book.
Temporary is one word which describes a persons life.
Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)
Honestly, Aliens are really the reason why we're here.
The "Most Likely to Become an Evil Genius" Frookie Winner
#Ian4CM
#Frook4Member
#Excalibur4PermaBan
#Ian4CM
#Frook4Member
#Excalibur4PermaBan
Return to “Serious Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests