Talk about serious issues here!
-
pudingeX
- The Supreme Noobie Doobie
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 11:15
- Location: In Uranus... HAHAHA
Postby pudingeX » 11 Jun 2011, 10:19
Fuipui wrote:Nuclear power has its ups and downs (and big booms!).
ikr XD
Yos
-
Shadow00
Postby Shadow00 » 11 Jun 2011, 15:12
Nuclear energy shall destroy us all. You know that if we fill 1% ONLY of the Sahara desert, we could provide enough power FOR THE WHOLE WORLD? That means no more pollution, AND, the sahara desert is one of the safest places on earth. Not many to no earthquakes happen there, so it should be awesome if those plans are carried out.
-
mmm
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 23:19
- Location: Straight outta Compton
Postby mmm » 12 Jun 2011, 23:56
Shadow00 wrote:Nuclear energy shall destroy us all. You know that if we fill 1% ONLY of the Sahara desert, we could provide enough power FOR THE WHOLE WORLD? That means no more pollution, AND, the sahara desert is one of the safest places on earth. Not many to no earthquakes happen there, so it should be awesome if those plans are carried out.
Um, what? You said it will destroy us all. And then something about filling up the Sahara desert. With what? And that filling it with something would provide enough power for the whole world. If we could do that, we'd have done that already.
For trying.
-
Shadow00
Postby Shadow00 » 13 Jun 2011, 00:02
mmm wrote:Shadow00 wrote:Nuclear energy shall destroy us all. You know that if we fill 1% ONLY of the Sahara desert, we could provide enough power FOR THE WHOLE WORLD? That means no more pollution, AND, the sahara desert is one of the safest places on earth. Not many to no earthquakes happen there, so it should be awesome if those plans are carried out.
Um, what? You said it will destroy us all. And then something about filling up the Sahara desert. With what? And that filling it with something would provide enough power for the whole world. If we could do that, we'd have done that already.
Well, that's the sad point. You see, the Sahara desert belongs to some countries. So if we fill a part of it with solar panels (sorry, forgot to write that),we allow the person who owns that part of the Sahara to shut down the solar panels and leave the whole world without energy. That's why we don't do that...
-
cichsteency
- Noobie Doobie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13 Jun 2011, 12:52
Postby cichsteency » 14 Jun 2011, 18:25
Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an extraordinarily spectacular opportunity to read critical reviews from this web site. It is usually so superb and as well , stuffed with amusement for me and my office co-workers to search the blog minimum thrice a week to read the latest stuff you have. And definitely, I am also usually astounded with your good secrets you serve. Certain 1 ideas in this posting are unequivocally the most beneficial I've had. gbg leads
-
Shadow00
Postby Shadow00 » 14 Jun 2011, 18:31
cichsteency wrote:I am also usually astounded with your good secrets you serve. Certain 1 ideas in this posting are unequivocally the most beneficial I've had.
That's my idea, isn't it? (0)_(0)
-
mmm
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 23:19
- Location: Straight outta Compton
Postby mmm » 14 Jun 2011, 21:25
Shadow00 wrote:mmm wrote:Shadow00 wrote:Nuclear energy shall destroy us all. You know that if we fill 1% ONLY of the Sahara desert, we could provide enough power FOR THE WHOLE WORLD? That means no more pollution, AND, the sahara desert is one of the safest places on earth. Not many to no earthquakes happen there, so it should be awesome if those plans are carried out.
Um, what? You said it will destroy us all. And then something about filling up the Sahara desert. With what? And that filling it with something would provide enough power for the whole world. If we could do that, we'd have done that already.
Well, that's the sad point. You see, the Sahara desert belongs to some countries. So if we fill a part of it with solar panels (sorry, forgot to write that),we allow the person who owns that part of the Sahara to shut down the solar panels and leave the whole world without energy. That's why we don't do that...
Oooh. That would be a good idea, as long as the solar panels were kept intact. The Sahara isn't necessarily kind.
For trying.
-
mmm
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 23:19
- Location: Straight outta Compton
Postby mmm » 16 Jun 2011, 01:13
I'm not going to write another book on nuclear power, but a new method that is meltdown-proof has been developed. It involves using some sort of salt, but the point is that when it goes without power, the radioactive material instantly solidifies.
For trying.
-
Zados
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 789
- Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 09:05
- Location: on tour
Postby Zados » 16 Jun 2011, 05:15
germany shut down 8 nuclear power plants - they are not going to come back online
R.I.P. Dad ... you'll never be forgotten!
-
Dr Frook
- FWG Mod
- Posts: 9039
- Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 05:35
- Location: freaksville
-
Contact:
Postby Dr Frook » 16 Jun 2011, 05:26
mmm wrote:I'm not going to write another book on nuclear power, but a new method that is meltdown-proof has been developed. It involves using some sort of salt, but the point is that when it goes without power, the radioactive material instantly solidifies.
that sounds interesting. Tell me more or give me a link?
The BUGBLATTER BEAST HAS SPOKEN, ALL HAIL THE BLATTERER!
Return to “Serious Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
|
|