CIA History Says To Not Arm Rebels, Obama Does It Anyway.

[Shadowstar1922]

yay, because arming them is going to work 124% good job obama thank you defense contractors oh yes i did not forget you energy sector haha finally there will be peace!!

[Shadow00]

[youtube]http://youtu.be/1_OHhbdX7Nc[/youtube]

yay, because arming them is going to work 124% good job obama thank you defense contractors oh yes i did not forget you energy sector haha finally there will be peace!!

Dude, think a bit further into it.
As said on previous post, the whole of US is literally going for yet another war. Direct i dunno, but the indirect part is arming the rebels.

Its 'murica, and its totally dealing freedom and democracy as usual.
Just be glad that it will probably lengthen that countrys lifespan for a while more.
If not for such wars, US wouldve ceased to exist years ago.

[Shadowstar1922]

[youtube]http://youtu.be/1_OHhbdX7Nc[/youtube]

yay, because arming them is going to work 124% good job obama thank you defense contractors oh yes i did not forget you energy sector haha finally there will be peace!!

Dude, think a bit further into it.
As said on previous post, the whole of US is literally going for yet another war. Direct i dunno, but the indirect part is arming the rebels.

Its 'murica, and its totally dealing freedom and democracy as usual.
Just be glad that it will probably lengthen that countrys lifespan for a while more.
If not for such wars, US wouldve ceased to exist years ago.

The USA would still be around without it's interventions, they do it to give strength to the defense contractors and to secure American Imperialism. Saying America cannot survive without it's international interventions is like saying Britain should've collapsed entirely when America, India, and Africa broke away.

[Shadow00]

[youtube]http://youtu.be/1_OHhbdX7Nc[/youtube]

yay, because arming them is going to work 124% good job obama thank you defense contractors oh yes i did not forget you energy sector haha finally there will be peace!!

Dude, think a bit further into it.
As said on previous post, the whole of US is literally going for yet another war. Direct i dunno, but the indirect part is arming the rebels.

Its 'murica, and its totally dealing freedom and democracy as usual.
Just be glad that it will probably lengthen that countrys lifespan for a while more.
If not for such wars, US wouldve ceased to exist years ago.

The USA would still be around without it's interventions, they do it to give strength to the defense contractors and to secure American Imperialism. Saying America cannot survive without it's international interventions is like saying Britain should've collapsed entirely when America, India, and Africa broke away.

Are you suggesting that the currently afraid and crumbling Britain is the same as the one that once had half the world under her?
Cause I don't see it that way.

US without wars is not US.

[Shadowstar1922]

No, I' not, I'm just saying the country is still the same in aspects of stability and government. Yes, it lost a lot of land, but the country is still there, still being British, still with it's military, still on the islands.

The USA is a huuge country, we don't need to bomb others to keep our power. Without our interventions, we'll still be the United States of America.

[Dr Frook]

the west constantly f's up countries taking sides and making situations so much worse than they were.

[Shadowstar1922]

the west constantly f's up countries taking sides and making situations so much worse than they were.

Couldn't agree more.

[Leprechaun Lukia]

Winning wars would assert some sort of dominance or strength over other countries; when America, Britain and France won the second World War, do you think people were like "oh we won the war. cool." No. They were like "YES WE WON THE WAR WELL DONE FELLAS" or something of the sort. Victory Day WAS a thing, and Germany hasn't made much moves since, because they know they'll get trounced again by America, France and Britain.

Now, I may be wrong about some points above, but, America got assertion and dominance because of the wars. America without it's wars would be like rocky road without marshmellows, it's not the same.

[Shadowstar1922]

Winning wars would assert some sort of dominance or strength over other countries; when America, Britain and France won the second World War, do you think people were like "oh we won the war. cool." No. They were like "YES WE WON THE WAR WELL DONE FELLAS" or something of the sort. Victory Day WAS a thing, and Germany hasn't made much moves since, because they know they'll get trounced again by America, France and Britain.

Now, I may be wrong about some points above, but, America got assertion and dominance because of the wars. America without it's wars would be like rocky road without marshmellows, it's not the same.

America shouldn't have to dominate anyone at all. It shouldn't be a thing. Countless men and women and children pay the ultimate cost just so big bad America, or big bad China, or big bad Russia, or big bad UK can have fun manipulating countries as they please.

You can assert yourself economically or socially. I mean, Germany did that after the unification and only had to fight France to tell Europe and the world they mean business. Their economic expansions into the middle east, India, and Asia was not through overthrowing local governments and setting up puppet states, but by simply sending their merchants on behalf of the Imperial Court and setting up trade and establishing permanent businesses and the world looked at Germany like, "oh wow damn the germans sure do know how to run stuff." Their powerful government gave social dominance. I mean, Japan conquered half of Asia for the world to look at Japan like they looked at the German Empire.

[Leprechaun Lukia]

Winning wars would assert some sort of dominance or strength over other countries; when America, Britain and France won the second World War, do you think people were like "oh we won the war. cool." No. They were like "YES WE WON THE WAR WELL DONE FELLAS" or something of the sort. Victory Day WAS a thing, and Germany hasn't made much moves since, because they know they'll get trounced again by America, France and Britain.

Now, I may be wrong about some points above, but, America got assertion and dominance because of the wars. America without it's wars would be like rocky road without marshmellows, it's not the same.

America shouldn't have to dominate anyone at all. It shouldn't be a thing. Countless men and women and children pay the ultimate cost just so big bad America, or big bad China, or big bad Russia, or big bad UK can have fun manipulating countries as they please.

That would just show how corrupt government is, and what they'll do to get what they want, They don't care about anyone else except themselves.

You can assert yourself economically or socially. I mean, Germany did that after the unification and only had to fight France to tell Europe and the world they mean business. Their economic expansions into the middle east, India, and Asia was not through overthrowing local governments and setting up puppet states, but by simply sending their merchants on behalf of the Imperial Court and setting up trade and establishing permanent businesses and the world looked at Germany like, "oh wow damn the germans sure do know how to run stuff." Their powerful government gave social dominance. I mean, Japan conquered half of Asia for the world to look at Japan like they looked at the German Empire.