Does MY DEFINITION of true love exist

[org36]

This topic should have it's name changed to 'does my definition of true love exist?' And org should lay his definition clearly out on the table, then I will give my own definitive (to myself) yes or no.

Oooooh, good suggestion. I'll do that right away.

My definition of true love is that it is the perfect form of love. However, nothing is perfect. So, by that logic, true love wouldn't exist. There you go, my definition.

[The Divine Potato]

This topic should have it's name changed to 'does my definition of true love exist?' And org should lay his definition clearly out on the table, then I will give my own definitive (to myself) yes or no.

Oooooh, good suggestion. I'll do that right away.

My definition of true love is that it is the perfect form of love. However, nothing is perfect. So, by that logic, true love wouldn't exist. There you go, my definition.

No

[org36]

To whoever changed the title: since when was the topic about me? Also, even if someone was wrong in a debate, you need to prove them wrong instead of saying "WRONG". Thank you for your non-existant cooperation.

P.S. You're either a hacker or a mod attempting to troll. If you're going to troll me, just delete this topic from existance. So yeah. Go ahead.

Nice that when someone points out the flaws in your argument you simply delete them. Hypocritical much. Trolling is for the lols, I'm simply correcting your missteps anonymously.

Also

existence*

[Shadow00]

Noones definition of true love exists cause in the very bottom line, we are all animals striving for survival and others kinda draw us back so he.

Being able to truly love someone means you have no self reservation instincts

Get rekt by anthropology 101

[The Divine Potato]

Noones definition of true love exists cause in the very bottom line, we are all animals striving for survival and others kinda draw us back so he.

Being able to truly love someone means you have no self reservation instincts

Get rekt by anthropology 101

Unless you aren't actually a complacent little mouthbreather and take part in the rebelliousness that has got our species this far, you usually believe in subjectivity, rather than a fixed set of facts which are just theories that have yet to be proven wrong.

If you think true love = a one night stand, true love exists, you have achieved enlightenment

[Shadow00]

Noones definition of true love exists cause in the very bottom line, we are all animals striving for survival and others kinda draw us back so he.

Being able to truly love someone means you have no self reservation instincts

Get rekt by anthropology 101

Unless you aren't actually a complacent little mouthbreather and take part in the rebelliousness that has got our species this far, you usually believe in subjectivity, rather than a fixed set of facts which are just theories that have yet to be proven wrong.

If you think true love = a one night stand, true love exists, you have achieved enlightenment

Lel OK.
You call upon:
Science AND subjectivity in 1 sentence
That's in the very least a thing some romantic yet not so smart person would do, mind you.
Science follows one rule mainly: NOTHING is true.(everything is permitted)
Even if proven so, its not cause one day it might not be.
People once "subjectively" believed the earth was flat. Sadly they were our ancestors.
Saying true love exists is the exact opposite of science. You got ZERO proof other than some brain reaction telling you to get as many descendants as possible.
You want to prove true love exists? Go ahead. Its about as easy as proving god exists. You just close your ears and say it is so. Not very scientific, I suppose.
Science is indeed to some part subjective though. That subjectivity is backed up by FACTS. SCIENTIFICAL FACTS. Prove me true love exists with an equation and I'll be a BIT more convinced you're right.
If you can't, don't bother, I'm quite adamant regarding facts and science.

[Shadow00]

Animals too have intelligence and emotions, and it does exceed their survival instincts (usually mother animal to child). It goes into survival of the species kind of love category.

The point is, science does apply to everything, its just not in your interest to think so.

Eg- people want to think they don't just die and simply cease to exist, cause they are self aware and know what death is.
They want to believe in life beyond death. They can't prove that with science so simply they say that science can't be applied to that, when it perfectly can.

And I can assure you, science and scientific facts aren't comforting at all.
It would be better for most people to believe in already mentioned afterlife than knowing their lives (a lot) more than likely serve no purpose at all.

[The Divine Potato]

Here is my equation

You = U

Romantic intrest = <3

Dopamine = DP

U+<3=DP

In about the simplest scientific equation regarding the subject you can get.

Basically, science (Entirely exempting all biologies) Is the study of something that isn't human, when we try to compare two opposites we end up with odd results.

And if subjectivity is not right then there is still always chaos theory

[The Divine Potato]

Animals too have intelligence and emotions, and it does exceed their survival instincts (usually mother animal to child). It goes into survival of the species kind of love category.

The point is, science does apply to everything, its just not in your interest to think so.

Eg- people want to think they don't just die and simply cease to exist, cause they are self aware and know what death is.
They want to believe in life beyond death. They can't prove that with science so simply they say that science can't be applied to that, when it perfectly can.

And I can assure you, science and scientific facts aren't comforting at all.
It would be better for most people to believe in already mentioned afterlife than knowing their lives (a lot) more than likely serve no purpose at all.

Oh and these points are why I will never join in a debate about life after death, I do not know many things, but I know that the subject is the hardest thing for me to talk about, makes me freeze up when thinking about beginnings, ends, creation, destruction, generally it is hard to type this paragraph here

[Shadow00]

Here is my equation

You = U

Romantic intrest = <3

Dopamine = DP

U+<3=DP

In about the simplest scientific equation regarding the subject you can get.

Basically, science (Entirely exempting all biologies) Is the study of something that isn't human, when we try to compare two opposites we end up with odd results.

And if subjectivity is not right then there is still always chaos theory

You can also see it like this (more scientifically correct).

You=U
Basic Instinct of reproduction=BI (no pun intended)
False idea of love= </3
Dopamine=DP
U+BI=DP---></3

love doesn't cause dopamine to get produced, your instincts cause it making you think you're in love while all your brain really wants is to make you give the world some divine potato chips.